Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Mar 28.
Published in final edited form as: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2012 Nov 19;18(2):152–161. doi: 10.1177/1074248412458975

Table 2.

Comparison of LV remodeling and function by CMR, before (Baseline) and 28 days after induction of experimental autoimmune myocarditis, following 20 days of daily IP injection of cromolyn sodium or saline

Cromolyn (n=7) Control (n=5) P for treatment effect
LV wall thickness, mm
Baseline 2.5±0.08 2.5±0.08 0.63
28 days 2.7±0.16 2.8±0.22
P 0.32 0.46
LVDA, mm2
Baseline 36±2 34±3
28 days 43±3 45±3 0.97
P 0.02 0.01
LVSA, mm2
Baseline 9±1 9±0.9
28 days 13±2 18±2 0.12
P 0.03 0.005
LV mass, mg
Baseline 437±24 453±38
28 days 501±34 480±43 0.95
P 0.19 0.65
EDV, μL
Baseline 306±22 301±34
28 days 417±29 451±32 0.68
P <0.001 0.04
ESV, μL
Baseline 116±9 114±10
28 days 226±20 277±29
P 0.001 0.007
SV, μL
Baseline 190±17 187±25
28 days 191±27 174±6 0.67
P 0.96 0.61
EF, %
Baseline 62±2 62±2
28 days 45±5 39±3 0.35
P 0.03 0.001
a

Values are means ± SE.

b

P values in the left columns are for the differences between baseline and 28-days measurements. P values in the right column reflect comparison of the differences between treatment and control groups over time (see Methods).

c

LV = left ventricular; LVDA = LV end diastolic area; LVSA = LV end systolic area; EDV = end diastolic volume; ESV= end systolic volume; SV= stroke volume = EDV – ESV; EF = ejection fraction =[(EDV (−) ESV)/EDV]×100.