. 2014 Feb 3;24(3):242–251. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.12.015

Table 1.

Cell Number Dimorphisms

Neuronal Class	Cell Number Dependent on fru^M?	Effect of Single Isoform?	Isoform Expression	♂ fru⁺	♀ fru⁺	♀ fru^M	♂ fru^F	♂ fru^ΔA	♂ fru^B2	♂ fru^C1
pMP4/P1	no	no	A, B, C	17.3 ± 3.8 (n = 10)	0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 10)	0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 10)	17.3 ± 3.3 (n = 10)	17.7 ± 2.9 (n = 10)	17.9 ± 3.9 (n = 10)	17.1 ± 2.7 (n = 10)
pIP10	yes	no	B, C	0.7 ± 0.5 (n = 30)	0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 30)	1.0 ± 0.2 (n = 22)^∗∗∗	0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 24)^∗∗∗	0.8 ± 0.4 (n = 38)	1.0 ± 0.2 (n = 24)	0.9 ± 0.3 (n = 40)
dPR1	yes	no	A, B	0.9 ± 0.3 (n = 32)	0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 20)	0.8 ± 0.4 (n = 14)^∗∗∗	0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 58)^∗∗∗	0.9 ± 0.4 (n = 44)	0.8 ± 0.4 (n = 32)	0.9 ± 0.3 (n = 46)
vPR1	yes	no	A, B, C	3.1 ± 0.6 (n = 20)	0.2 ± 0.5 (n = 20)	2.8 ± 0.9 (n = 20)^∗∗∗	0.6 ± 0.5 (n = 20)^∗∗∗	3.2 ± 0.6 (n = 20)	3.1 ± 1.2 (n = 20)	2.8 ± 0.5 (n = 20)
vPR6	partially	yes, C	A, B, C	2.9 ± 0.7 (n = 18)	0.0 ± 0.0 (n = 20)	0.8 ± 0.8 (n = 16)^∗∗∗	0.6 ± 0.9 (n = 20)^∗∗∗	3.4 ± 0.6 (n = 20)	3.0 ± 0.8 (n = 18)	1.9 ± 1.0 (n = 20)^∗∗∗
aDT2/mAL	yes	yes, B and C	A, B, C	11.1 ± 1.4 (n = 20)	5.1 ± 1.7 (n = 20)	12.3 ± 1.9 (n = 20)^∗∗∗	5.1 ± 1.8 (n = 20)^∗∗∗	10.2 ± 1.9 (n = 20)	8.1 ± 2.1 (n = 20)^∗∗∗	8.2 ± 2.6 (n = 20)^∗∗∗
aSP1	yes	no	A, B, C	13.3 ± 1.6 (n = 20)	2.2 ± 1.1 (n = 20)	14.5 ± 1.5 (n = 20)^∗∗∗	5.0 ± 1.6 (n = 20)^∗∗∗	15.0 ± 2.2 (n = 16)	14.9 ± 2.0 (n = 18)	15.2 ± 1.8 (n = 20)
aSP2	yes	no	A, B, C	62.1 ± 10.3 (n = 10)	32.9 ± 3.7 (n = 10)	63.0 ± 8.6 (n = 10)^∗∗∗	34.3 ± 6.5 (n = 10)^∗∗∗	67.0 ± 7.6 (n = 10)	67.6 ± 11.1 (n = 10)	62.9 ± 7.8 (n = 10)

Cell bodies per hemisphere ± SD. n, number of hemispheres evaluated. Asterisks indicate significant increase of cells in ♀ fru^M compared to ♀ fru⁺, significant decrease of cells in ♂ fru^F compared to ♂ fru⁺, and significant decrease of cells in ♂ fru^B2 or ♂ fru^C1 compared to ♂ fru⁺ (^∗∗∗p < 0.0001, Mann-Whitney test).