Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 3;24(3):229–241. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2013.11.035

Figure 3.

Figure 3

FruM Isoform-Specific Analysis of Male Courtship Song

All genotypes indicated are males; target females are wild-type Canton-S. Bars above represent groupings for statistical comparisons where the controls are fru4-40/+ for all mutants in combination with Df(3R)fru4-40, frusat15/+ for all mutants in combination with Df(3R)frusat15, and +/+ for all mutants in combination with Canton-S. Error bars represent 95% confidence intervals. Numerical values associated with each measurement are shown in Figure S3 along with n values for each genotype.

(A) Interpulse interval in ms. ∗∗p < 0.001; ∗∗∗p < 0.001 (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test).

(B) Pulse frequency in Hz. p < 0.01 (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test).

(C) Sine frequency in Hz (Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test). SA, sine song absent.

(D) Song recording from wild-type (+/+) and homozygous fruΔC mutant males. Examples of pulse and sine song are highlighted.