Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan;100(100):107–114. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.025

Table 2.

Odds ratios for the associations between wealth variables at baseline and individual problem drinking at follow-up, adjusting for potential confounders.

Variables in the model Comparison of wealth N Odds ratio 95% CI p-Value
Model Ia High vs. low household wealth 982 0.58 0.27 1.29 0.186
High vs. low village wealth 982 1.09 0.47 2.56 0.841
High vs. low inequality 981 2.00 0.85 4.68 0.111
Model IIb High vs. low household wealth 981 0.53 0.24 1.20 0.131
High vs. low village wealth 981 1.24 0.51 3.02 0.638
High vs. low inequality 981 2.03 0.86 4.79 0.104
Model IIIc High vs. low household wealth 981 0.65 0.28 1.48 0.301
High vs. low village wealth 981 1.11 0.47 2.62 0.808
High vs. low inequality 981 2.30 1.02 5.22 0.046
a

Adjusted for all demographic variables: problem drinking at baseline, age, sex, marital status, education, work status, stressful life event and strata.

b

Further adjusted for other wealth variables at baseline.

c

Further adjusted for changes in household wealth, village wealth and wealth inequality from baseline to follow-up.