Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan;110(1):199–212. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.002

Table 1.

Example 1 – HDR 192Ir BT source for vaginal cylinder applicator.

Category Typical level (%) Assumptions
Source strength 2 PSDL traceable calibrations
Treatment planning 3 Reference data with the appropriate bin width
Medium dosimetric corrections 1 Valid for applicator without shielding and if CTV located inside pelvis; an advanced dose calculation formalism should be used if this assumption false
Dose delivery including registration of applicator geometry to anatomy 5 Accurate QA concept for commissioning and constancy checks, especially for source positioning and applicator/source path geometry, appropriate imaging techniques (either small slice thickness, 3D sequences or combination of different slice orientations), applicator libraries (either by using software solutions or manual)
Interfraction/Intrafraction changes between imaging and dose delivery 5 For one treatment plan per applicator insertion and measures to detect major variations for subsequent fractions
Total dosimetric uncertainty (k = 1) 8 For treatment delivered with the same BT source

Estimated value based on expert discussion.