Skip to main content
. 2014 Jan;110(1):199–212. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.11.002

Table 4.

Example 4 – LDR 125I sources for permanent prostate BT.

Category Typical level (%) Assumptions
Source strength 3 PSDL traceable calibrations
Treatment planning 4 Reference data with the appropriate bin width
Medium dosimetric corrections 5 No consideration is given for calcifications or their composition in the patient
Inter-seed attenuation 4 An advanced dose calculation formalism may indicate source models and orientations cause the largest effects
Treatment delivery imaging 2 US QA performed according to AAPM TG-128
Target contouring uncertainty 2 Using CT or CT + T2 imaging
Anatomy changes between dose delivery and post-implant imaging 7 Post-implant imaging using CT, with a scalar correction factor for edema correction
Total dosimetric uncertainty (k = 1) 11 For treatment delivered without excreted seeds

Estimated value based on expert discussion.