Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2013 Sep 30;44(1):181–193. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2013.836454

Table 2. Bivariate predictors of latent trajectory class membership.

Group 1 relative to Group 2 Group 1 relative to Group 3 Group 2 relative to Group 3

Variables B (SE) p B (SE) p B (SE) p
Sex (male) 0.52 (0.31) 0.01 1.33 (0.54) 0.01 0.82 (0.54) n.s.
Multiple attempters (yes) −0.80 (0.30) 0.01 −1.28 (0.43) 0.003 −0.49 (0.41) n.s.
Depressive symptoms −0.08 (0.01) <0.001 −0.10 (0.02) <0.001 −0.02 (0.02) n.s.
Externalizing problems −0.09 (0.02) <0.001 −0.08 (0.02) 0.001 0.01 (0.02) n.s.
Hopelessness −0.24 (0.05) <0.001 −0.35 (0.06) <0.001 −0.11 (0.04) 0.01
Substance abuse −0.04 (0.02) 0.01 −0.01 (0.02) n.s 0.03 (0.02) 0.08
Physical abuse history (yes) −0.21 (0.37) n.s. −0.11 (0.45) 0.01 −0.90 (0.42) 0.03
Sexual abuse history (yes) −1.05 (0.40) 0.01 −0.88 (0.51) 0.09 0.18 (0.44) n.s.

Notes: Group 1 = Subclinical ideators; Group 2 =Elevated but rapidly declining; Group 3 = Chronically elevated; Reference group in paranthases; Family connectendess, peer connectedness, and parental psychiatric history were not significant predcitors of latent class membership