Table 3.
Correlation results between different diet composition of patients with type II DM.
| Fat composition | PUFA | MUFA | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sugar percentage (Spearman rho r, p) | -0.601, p<0.01 | -0.489, p<0.01 | -0.674, p<0.01 |
| Vegetable (Spearman rho r, p) | 0.181, p<0.05 | 0.310, p<0.01 | Not significant |
| Fiber (Spearman rho r, p) | 0.280, p<0.01 | 0.294, p<0.01 | Not significant |