TABLE 3.
Condition | Therapeutic Method | Category of Evidencea
|
Considerations | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Pancreatic NET | Gastrointestinal NET | |||
| ||||
Complete resection possible | Complete resection of primary and metastatic lesions | 2A | 2A | Resection of small asymptomatic primary tumors in the presence of unresectable metastases is not indicated |
Asymptomatic stable disease, and low tumor burden | Observation | 2A | 2A | According to PROMID trial results, octreotide treatment is recommended for gastrointestinal NETs, and observation strategy needs a critical reevaluation |
Octreotide | § | 2A | Octreotide treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is not included in NCCN 2012 guidelines | |
Clinically significant tumor burden, progressive disease | Octreotide | 2B | 2A | Pancreatic NET: MTT or cytotoxic chemotherapy first or consider other methods |
MTT | 2A | 3 | Gastrointestinal NET: octreotide and consider other methods | |
Cytotoxic chemotherapy | 2A | 3 | Ablative therapy or cytoreductive surgery: only if nearly complete resection or removal can be achieved | |
Liver-directed therapy (transarterial embolization, ablative therapy, cytoreductive surgery) | 2B | 2B |
Note—PROMID = Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors, LAR = long-acting repeatable, MTT = molecular targeted therapy.
National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) categories of evidence and consensus [4]: 1, on the basis of high-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate; 2A, on the basis of lower-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate; 2B, on the basis of lower-level evidence, there is NCCN agreement but not consensus that the intervention is appropriate; 3, on the basis of any level of evidence, there is major disagreement that the intervention is appropriate.