Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013 Oct;201(4):811–824. doi: 10.2214/AJR.12.10240

TABLE 3.

Therapeutic Methods for the Management of Unresectable and Metastatic Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors (NETs)

Condition Therapeutic Method Category of Evidencea
Considerations
Pancreatic NET Gastrointestinal NET

Complete resection possible Complete resection of primary and metastatic lesions 2A 2A Resection of small asymptomatic primary tumors in the presence of unresectable metastases is not indicated
Asymptomatic stable disease, and low tumor burden Observation 2A 2A According to PROMID trial results, octreotide treatment is recommended for gastrointestinal NETs, and observation strategy needs a critical reevaluation
Octreotide § 2A Octreotide treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors is not included in NCCN 2012 guidelines
Clinically significant tumor burden, progressive disease Octreotide 2B 2A Pancreatic NET: MTT or cytotoxic chemotherapy first or consider other methods
MTT 2A 3 Gastrointestinal NET: octreotide and consider other methods
Cytotoxic chemotherapy 2A 3 Ablative therapy or cytoreductive surgery: only if nearly complete resection or removal can be achieved
Liver-directed therapy (transarterial embolization, ablative therapy, cytoreductive surgery) 2B 2B

Note—PROMID = Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind, Prospective Randomized Study on the Effect of Octreotide LAR in the Control of Tumor Growth in Patients With Metastatic Neuroendocrine Midgut Tumors, LAR = long-acting repeatable, MTT = molecular targeted therapy.

a

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) categories of evidence and consensus [4]: 1, on the basis of high-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate; 2A, on the basis of lower-level evidence, there is NCCN consensus that the intervention is appropriate; 2B, on the basis of lower-level evidence, there is NCCN agreement but not consensus that the intervention is appropriate; 3, on the basis of any level of evidence, there is major disagreement that the intervention is appropriate.