Skip to main content
. 2013 Dec 5;1(7):e00174. doi: 10.1002/phy2.174

Table 1.

CT and Hemodynamic analysis of resting systolic and diastolic function 20 weeks post aortic banding.

CON HF HF‐CsA
Systolic function
HR (beats/min) 126 ± 5 106 ± 4* 114 ± 4§
MAP (mmHg) 53 ± 11 59 ± 4 86 ± 8*,
LV ESV (mL) 32 ± 3 24 ± 2 43 ± 3
LV ESP (mmHg) 65 ± 7 81 ± 6 109 ± 9*
LV EF (%) 54 ± 2 56 ± 4 47 ± 3
LA ESV (mL) 25 ± 2 28 ± 1 44 ± 3*,
LA EF (%) 47 ± 1 40 ± 5 33 ± 2*
Diastolic function
LV EDV (mL) 70 ± 8 57 ± 6 80 ± 4
LV EDP (mmHg) 11 ± 1 11 ± 1 15 ± 1*,
LA EDV (mL) 47 ± 2 46 ± 1 65 ± 3*,
Morphology
LV Mass (g) 85 ± 4 87 ± 3 103 ± 3*,
LV Mass:Vol (g/mL) 1.2 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1*, 1.3 ± 0.1

Values are means ± SE. HR, heart rate; MAP, mean arterial pressure; LV ESV, left ventricular end systolic volume; LV ESP, left ventricular end systolic pressure; LV EF, left ventricular ejection fraction; LA ESV, left atrial end systolic volume; LA EF, left atrial ejection fraction; LV EDV,, left ventricular end diastolic volume; LV EDP,, left ventricular end diastolic pressure; LA EDV, left atrial end diastolic volume; LV mass:Vol, LV free wall mass:LV EDV ratio. Significance is indicated at *P < 0.05 versus CON; †P < 0.05 versus HF; ‡P < 0.05 versus HF‐CsA; §P = 0.08 versus CON.