. 2014 Jan 24;472(5):1535–1544. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3469-1

Table 2.

Statistical comparison of the posterior horizontal dislocation distances*

Design type	Hemispheric fixed bearing	Subhemispheric dual mobility	Modular dual mobility
Subhemispheric dual mobility	p = 0.474; R² = 0.182; 95% CI, −1.231 to 2.081	N/A
Modular Dual Mobility (MDM™)	p < 0.001; R² = 0.985; 95% CI, 4.65–7.35	p < 0.001; R² = 0.998; 95% CI, 5.118–6.032	N/A
Anatomic Dual Mobility (ADM™)	p < 0.001; R² = 0.999; 95% CI, 8.204–9.996	p< 0.001; R² = 0.998; 95% CI, −10.31 to −7.959	p = 0.005; R² = 0.98; 95% CI, 2.417–4.5

* Paired 2-tail t-test; N/A = not applicable; MDM™ and ADM™, Stryker Orthopaedics, Mahwah, NJ, USA.