Skip to main content
. 2013 Nov 19;472(5):1496–1501. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-3347-2

Table 4.

Survivorship of different TKA prosthesis designs

TKA design Years Number* Mean followup years/(range) At 5 years** (95% CI) At 10 years** (95% CI) At 15 years** (95% CI) HR (95% CI) p value
Duracon™ 1992–2011 990/18199 8.5 (0–19) 96.4 (96.1,96.7) 94.4 (94.0,94.7) 91.9 (91.5,92.3) 1.0
PFC®
Sigma®
1989–2011 590/13292 6.2 (0–22) 96.8 (96.4,97.1) 94.8 (94.4,95.2) 88.9 (88.3,89.4) 1.1 (1.0–1.2) 0.24
Miller-Galante II 1989–1998 111/1008 11.5 (0–20) 95.5 (94.0,96.7) 90.8 (88.8,92.4) 86.9 (84.7,88.9) 1.5 (1.2–1.8) < 0.001
PCA®/ modular 1985–1996 143/935 12.4 (0–23) 94.3 (92.5,95.6) 89.2 (87.0,91.1) 83.2 (80.7,85.6) 1.8 (1.5–2.2) < 0.001

* Number of revisions/number of total operations; **survivorship obtained via Kaplan-Meier analysis; HR = hazard ratio, according to Cox proportional hazards model (adjusted by sex and age); Duracon™, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA; PFC® Sigma®, DePuy Orthopaedics Inc, Warsaw, IN, USA; Miller-Galante II, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN, USA; Porous Coated Anatomic (PCA®)/modular, Stryker, Mahwah, NJ, USA.