Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Microsc Microanal. 2011 Dec 8;18(1):81–90. doi: 10.1017/S1431927611012220

Table 4.

Extracellular Matrix and Adhesion Molecule Array Analysis Uncovers ECM Differences with Aging and MMP-28 Deletion.

WT MMP-28−/−


Genes Young
(n = 3)
Old
(n = 3)
Young
(n = 9)
Old
(n = 7)
Ctnna1a 1.07 ± 0.10 0.97 ± 0.03 1.58 ± 0.11*§ 1.41 ± 0.06
Ctnnb1a 0.62 ± 0.04 0.60 ± 0.02 0.46 ± 0.02*§ 0.40 ± 0.02
Cdh4b 0.008 ± 0.0004 0.012 ± 0.0005 0.003 ± 0.0004*§ 0.006 ± 0.0007
Col1a1a 0.156 ± 0.003 0.095 ± 0.007* 0.044 ± 0.003*§ 0.042 ± 0.005
Col3a1a 0.88 ± 0.05 0.47 ± 0.07* 0.44 ± 0.03*§ 0.40 ± 0.04
Col4a1a 0.535 ± 0.051 0.335 ± 0.003* 0.626 ± 0.046 0.568 ± 0.044
Col6a1a 0.124 ± 0.012 0.084 ± 0.004* 0.139 ± 0.006 0.139 ± 0.007
Vcana 0.051 ± 0.004 0.043 ± 0.004 0.012 ± 0.001*§ 0.016 ± 0.002
Fn1a 0.058 ± 0.004 0.051 ± 0.007 0.029 ± 0.003*§ 0.028 ± 0.002
Itgavb 0.089 ± 0.006 0.089 ± 0.002 0.046 ± 0.005*§ 0.050 ± 0.004
Itgb1a 0.86 ± 0.08 0.94 ± 0.04 0.63 ± 0.04*§ 0.62 ± 0.04
Lama2a 0.086 ± 0.010 0.078 ± 0.009 0.115 ± 0.006 0.113 ± 0.007
Lamb2a 0.26 ± 0.02 0.22 ± 0.02 0.52 ± 0.04*§ 0.41 ± 0.03*
Mmp9b 0.00176 ± 0.00006 0.00262 ± 0.00060 0.00214 ± 0.00041 0.00746 ± 0.00119*
Mmp11b 0.00036 ± 0.00003 0.00043 ± 0.0008 0.00177 ± 0.00053§ 0.00107 ± 0.00011
Mmp15a 0.164 ± 0.002 0.146 ± 0.014 0.101 ± 0.010*§ 0.086 ± 0.006
Postna 0.056 ± 0.003 0.074 ± 0.001* 0.015 ± 0.001*§ 0.022 ± 0.002*
Seleb 0.0090 ± 0.0008 0.0084 ± 0.0011 0.0033 ± 0.0005*§ 0.0061 ± 0.0024
Sparca 0.597 ± 0.007 0.391 ± 0.013* 0.342 ± 0.016*§ 0.360 ± 0.008
Spp1b 0.0117 ± 0.0013 0.0055 ± 0.0018 0.0018 ± 0.0008*§ 0.0037 ± 0.0019
Thbs2a 0.068 ± 0.007 0.075 ± 0.003 0.048 ± 0.004*§ 0.056 ± 0.004
Timp1b 0.000054 ± 0.000004 0.000047 ± 0.000001 0.000314 ± 0.000204 0.000503 ± 0.000370
Vtna 0.138 ± 0.004 0.117 ± 0.014 0.118 ± 0.009 0.083 ± 0.007*

Of 84 genes analyzed, the 16 genes shown were statistically different among the groups. Gene levels are reported as 2−ΔCT units. All values are mean ± SEM.

*

p < 0.05 versus respective young control;

§

p < 0.05 versus WT young;

p < 0.05 versus WT old.

a

Analyzed by ANOVA.

b

Analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test.