Skip to main content
. 2013 Jul 16;223(3):195–227. doi: 10.1111/joa.12080

Table 12.

Mean shear and principal strain magnitudes across all bite points for different region of the mandible, in vivo and in silico. Bold values indicate significant results

In vivo experiments
FEM
Shear strain
Shear strain
Grand mean WS mean BS mean P-value Grand mean WS mean BS mean
All gage sites 1879 1630 < 2130 <0.001 518 339 < 696
Dentary 2122 1809 < 2449 <0.001 504 346 < 661
Splenial 1373 1240 < 1498 0.03 545 312 < 778
E1
E1
Grand mean WS mean BS mean P-value Grand mean WS mean BS mean
All gage sites 924 920 = 928 0.85 208 157 < 258
Dentary 1110 1083 = 1138 0.34 224 161 < 286
Splenial 536 562 = 512 0.3 202 170 < 233
E2* E2*
Grand mean WS mean BS mean P-value Grand mean WS mean BS mean
All gage sites −955 −710 < −1201 <0.001 −310 −182 < −438
Dentary −1012 −725 < −1310 <0.001 −280 −185 < −375
Splenial −837 −678 < −986 <0.001 −343 −141 < −545
E1/E2
E1/E2
Grand mean WS mean BS mean P-value Grand mean WS mean BS mean
All gage sites 1.18 1.6 > 0.84 <0.001 1.95 2.98 > 0.92
Dentary 1.4 1.88 > 0.95 <0.001 2.07 2.95 > 1.19
Splenial 0.77 0.94 > 0.61 <0.001 2.1 3.71 > 0.5
*

More negative E2 considered to be greater (higher compressive strain).