[Table/Fig-2]:
Follow-up | Reduction of pain from baseline values * | |
---|---|---|
LLLT Group | Sham control group | |
Immediate post- LLLT | 4.79 ± 0.86 p-value<0.001 (HS) | 0.13 ± 0.35 p-value>0.05 (NS) |
1st day follow-up | 4.58 ± 1.2 p-value<0.001 (HS) | 0.17 ± 0.38 p-value>0.05 (NS) |
2nd day follow-up | 5.41 ± 2.04 p-value<0.001 (HS) | 0.48 ± 1.57 p-value>0.05 (NS) |
3rd day follow-up | 4.72 ± 1.22 p-value<0.001 (HS) | 0.79 ± 0.62 p-value>0.05 (NS) |
* The improvement in pain was assessed by comparing the VAS scores at each follow-up interval with the baseline (pre-LLLT application) VAS scores