Skip to main content
. 2014 May 6;11(94):20131173. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.1173

Table 1.

Summary of model parameter values for baseline studies. In the final column, ‘experiment’ refers to the fitting to experimental data described in §2.1 and the electronic supplementary material, and ‘histology’ indicates estimation from histological tissue images, such as those illustrated in figure 1 or at www.virtualpathology.leeds.ac.uk, or from the cited references. The parameter k0 has been estimated based on the value of r1 (transport rate between cell layers) in the multi-layer model of [6]. The parameter kv has been chosen to give slower transport across the vessel wall than across the cell membrane, though in the disordered, leaky tumour vasculature this is likely to be highly variable. Note that the volume fractions used in §2 are defined by Inline graphic and Inline graphic where they are combined with the relevant compartmental volumes, Vi. We chose these to match the volumes of biological cells, though this is not necessary.

variable value description source of estimate
l 1.6 × 105 m vessel radius histology [21]
L 2.0 × 104 m cord radius (vessel + approx. nine cells) histology [22,23]
r ∼1.0 × 105 m cell radius histology [24]
δ 0.0625 extracellular–intracellular volume ratio parameter histology [6,25]
α ∼1.94028 × 105 m1 membrane surface–tissue volume ratio Inline graphic
k0 2.5 × 106 m s1 permeability between cells [6]
k1 1.0 × 106 m s1 permeability across cell membrane experiment
k2 0.90 × 106 μM1 s1 drug association rate experiment
k2 14.0 × 105 s1 drug dissociation rate experiment
kv 1.25 × 107 m s1 permeability across vessel wall estimated
D 5.0 × 1011 m2 s1 interstitial diffusion rate D = 2k0r
C0 2.6 × 103 μM binding site concentration experiment