Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 2;90(4):597–604. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.13-0614

Table 3.

Comparison of human landing catch (HLC) and bed net trap (BNT) sampling methods for Anopheles funestus and Anopheles gambiae s.l., November 1992 to May 1993*

Method No. collected Mean per night (95% CI) Relative rate (95% CI) P value
An. funestus
HLC 730 1.25 (1.05, 1.45) 1.00 NA
BNT 917 1.57 (1.34, 1.79) 1.27 (0.92, 1.76) 0.145
An. gambiae
HLC 2408 4.12 (3.47, 4.78) 1.00 NA
BNT 1389 2.38 (2.01, 2.74) 0.57 (0.44, 0.74) < 0.001
*

Relative rates of collection and associated 95% confidence interval (CI) and P value were calculated using negative binomial regression. P values indicate the probability that the relative collection rate of BNT sampling was not different from that of HLC.

HLC was used as the reference sampling method.

NA = not applicable.