Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 2.
Published in final edited form as: J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Sep 17;56(2):618–629. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0125)

Table 2.

Experimental design. For ease of explanation, examples are drawn from the aX, Yb grammar. Half of the participants heard the alternate bX, Ya grammar. Lower case letters are each represented by a single CV nonword. Uppercase letters indicate sets of nonwords, where X elements are CVC words and Y elements are CVCCV words. The XNew and YNew indicate items that were not heard previously, but conformed in syllable composition to X and Y items used in the familiarization phase.

Experimental Phase Item Type Set Size String Number of Strings Repetition of Each String* Examples

Familiarization aX, Yb grammar 3 aX 3 16 poe jeb ritva koo
Yb 3 16

24 aX 24 2
Yb 24 2

Test Items heard during training 3 aX 3 2 poe jeb ritva koo
Yb 3 2

24 aX 3 2
Yb 3 2

Items with co- occurrence violations 3 aY 3 2 poe ritva jeb koo
Xb 3 2

24 aY 3 2
Xb 3 2

Items with linear order violations 3 Xa 3 2 jeb poe koo ritva
bY 3 2

24 Xa 3 2
bY 3 2

Correct Generalization items 3 aXNew 3 2 poe sul valsa koo
YNewb 3 2

24 aXNew 3 2
YNewb 3 2

Incorrect generalization items with co- occurrence violations 3 aYNew 3 2 poe valsa sul koo
XNewb 3 2

24 aYNew 3 2
XNewb 3 2
*

Number of times each exemplar of the string type was heard during the experiment.