Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 9.
Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2011 Feb 10;19(3):249–259. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2011.2112780

Table V.

Comparison of decomposition results on the 5 experimental EMG signals (10%MVC, 20 s recordings).

EMG # 1 2 3 4 5
# Sources 5 5 8 8 4
% overlap 81 84 91 88 82
% overlap ≥ 3 63 61 74 69 65
MCMC on extended model
# Val 5 4 6 5 2
A 91.1% 90.6% 90.5% 89.3% 94.4%
Computing time (s.) 13.2 14.9 15.2 13.8 15.0
MCMC on uniform magnitude model
# Val 4 4 4 4 2
A 87.1% 90.4% 92.3% 89.2% 90.7%
Optimization using Tabu search [1]
# Val 3 4 4 4 2
A 89.4% 85.1% 87.7% 87.2% 92.5%