Table 4.
Study |
Year |
Case (%) |
Control (%) |
P-Value for Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium |
||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TT | CT | CC | TT | CT | TT | |||
Jiao et al. [15] |
2007 |
86 (72.9) |
29 (24.6) |
3 (2.5) |
194 (86.2) |
31 (13.8) |
0 (0.0) |
0.267 |
Zhao et al. [21] |
2011 |
221 (70.4) |
86 (27.4) |
7 (2.2) |
318 (81.7) |
67 (17.3) |
4 (1.0) |
0.823 |
Zheng et al. [22] |
2009 |
99 (78.6) |
25 (19.8) |
2 (1.6) |
100 (84.7) |
18 (15.3) |
0 (0.0) |
0.370 |
Niu et al. [18] |
2006 |
135 (79.4) |
34 (20.0) |
1 (0.6) |
138 (88.5) |
18 (11.5) |
0 (0.0) |
0.444 |
Wu et al. [20] |
2009 |
140 (79.1) |
37 (20.9) |
0 (0.0) |
284 (89.9) |
32 (10.1) |
0 (0.0) |
0.358 |
Mo et al. [17] |
2011 |
- |
- |
- |
366 (85.1) |
62 (14.4) |
2 (0.05) |
0.717 |
Huang et al. [14] |
2009 |
145 (65.9) |
66 (30.0) |
9 (0.41) |
150 (76.9) |
41 (21.0) |
4 (2.1) |
0.548 |
Wang et al. [19] |
2009 |
29 (64.4) |
15 (33.3) |
1 (2.2) |
51 (85.0) |
9 (15.0) |
0 (0.0) |
0.530 |
Zhang et al. [23] |
2012 |
530 (78.5) |
135 (20.0) |
10 (1.5) |
556 (87.5) |
74 (11.6) |
6 (0.9) |
0.052 |
Ma et al. [16] | 2011 | 80 (71.4) | 30 (26.8) | 2 (1.8) | 145 (86.3) | 21 (12.5) | 2 (1.2) | 0.231 |