Table 1.
Ovule numbers phenotype of the mutants cited in these article.
| Genotype | Ovule number per fruit | Ovule number per carpel | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ler | 26.4 ± 1.3 | Liu et al., 2000 | |
| lug-1 | 15.4 ± 4.2 | ||
| lug-3 | 14.9 ± 3.1 | ||
| ant-9 | 14.8 ± 3.1 | ||
| lug-1 ant-9 | 0.0 ± 0 | ||
| lug-3 ant-9 | 0.0 ± 0 | ||
| Col-0 | 25 ± 2.0 | Azhakanandam et al., 2008 | |
| Col-gl | 21 ± 3.0 | ||
| ant-1 | 12 ± 1.3 | ||
| ant-3 | 20 ± 2.7 | ||
| seu-3 | 23 ± 1.8 | ||
| seu-3 ant-1 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | ||
| seu-3 ant-3 | 13 ± 3.4 | ||
| Col-0 | 55.66 ± 0.83 | Nahar et al., 2012 | |
| spt-2 | 48.38 ± 0.61 | ||
| cuc1-1 spt-2 | 36.44 ± 0.59 | ||
| cuc2-1 spt-2 | 34.31 ± 0.49 | ||
| Col-0 | ~30 | Ishida et al., 2000* | |
| cuc1 | ~31 | ||
| cuc2 | ~32 | ||
| cuc1cuc2 | ~10 | ||
| Ler | 51.8 ± 0.6 | Galbiati et al., 2013 | |
| ant-4 | 17.8 ± 0.7 | ||
| cuc2-1 ant-4** | 20 ± 3 | ||
| cuc2-1 pSTK::CUC1_RNAi | 41.7 ± 0.9 | ||
| cuc2-1 ant-4 pSTK::CUC1_RNAi** | 8 ± 1 | ||
| pin1-5 | 8.6 ± 2 | ||
| Ler | 39.9 ± 1.1 | Elliott et al., 1996 | |
| ant-9 | 15.0 ± 0.8 | ||
| hll-1 | 10% less than wt | Skinner et al., 2001 | |
| hll-3 | 10% less than wt | ||
| Ler | 54 ± 4 | Broadhvest et al., 2000 | |
| sin-2 | 33 ± 7 | ||
| Col-0 | 48 | Bencivenga et al., 2012 | |
| cre1-12 ahk2-2 ahk3-3 | 5.5 | ||
| pin1-5 | 9.35 | ||
| Col-0 | 110 | Bartrina et al., 2011*** | |
| ckx3-1 ckx5-1 | 65 | ||
| Col-0 | 52.95 | Huang et al., 2012 | |
| bzr1-1D | 68.06 | ||
| bin2 | 29.07 | ||
| det2 | 52 | ||
| WS | 46.4 | ||
| bri1-5 | 32.2 | ||
| ap2-5 | 60.4 | ||
| bzr1-1D ap2-5 | 74.8 | ||
| Cvi | 55.5 ± 5.2 | Alonso-Blanco et al., 1999 | |
| Ler | 66.4 ± 3.9 | ||
| ashh2-1, | 80% less than wt | Grini et al., 2009 | |
| ashh2-2, | |||
| ashh2-5 |
Mutants presenting defects in the gynoecia or ovule development also reported to be affected at the level of ovule number.
*
plants regenerated from calli;
**
Galbiati F. personal communication;
***
the number refers to seeds.