Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 25;110(7):1811–1819. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.102

Table 2. Univariate analysis or multivariate analysis based on the Cox proportional hazard regression model for RFS and OS in patients enrolled in training cohort or validation cohort or Two datasets merging.

 
Univariate analysis
Multivariate analysis
Variables HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
Training cohort—RFS
AFU (⩽35 vs >35 u l−1) 2.277 (1.864–2.780) <0.001 1.738 (1.383–2.185) <0.001
Tumour size (⩽5 vs >5 cm) 2.055 (1.693–2.494) <0.001 1.663 (1.331–2.079) <0.001
GGT (⩽64 vs >64 u l−1) 1.527 (1.258–1.854) <0.001 1.159 (0.933–1.440) 0.183
AFP (⩽400 vs >400 ng ml−1) 1.239 (1.028–1.492) 0.024 0.905 (0.741–1.106) 0.330
Macrovascular invasion 1.498 (1.146–1.958) 0.003 1.248 (0.946–1.646) 0.117
ALP (⩽129 vs >129 u l−1)
1.328 (1.084–1.627)
0.006
0.998 (0.802–1.241)
0.982
Training cohort—OS
AFU (⩽35 vs >35 u l−1) 2.461 (1.982–3.056) <0.001 1.814 (1.421–2.315) <0.001
Tumour size (⩽5 vs >5 cm) 2.116 (1.692–2.646) <0.001 1.549 (1.208–1.985) 0.001
GGT (⩽64 vs >64 u l−1) 1.788 (1.424–2.247) <0.001 1.159 (0.893–1.504) 0.269
AFP (⩽400 vs >400 ng ml−1) 1.543 (1.247–1.910) <0.001 1.108 (0.883–1.391) 0.376
Macrovascular invasion 2.444 (1.844–3.240) <0.001 1.893 (1.411–2.539) <0.001
ALP (⩽129 vs >129 u l−1) 1.514 (1.209–1.894) <0.001 1.095 (0.859–1.395) 0.463
TB (⩽18.8 vs >18.8 mmol l−1)
1.394 (1.122–1.734)
0.003
1.354 (1.084–1.692)
0.008
Validation cohort—RFS
AFU (⩽35 vs >35 u l−1) 1.392 (1.013–1.912) 0.041 0.996 (0.691–1.437) 0.984
Tumour size (⩽5 vs >5 cm) 1.417 (1.014–1.979) 0.041 1.047 (0.718–1.527) 0.811
GGT (⩽64 vs >64 u l−1) 1.543 (1.115–2.136) 0.009 1.373 (0.956–1.974) 0.086
AFP (⩽400 vs >400 ng ml−1) 1.6979 (1.235–2.333) 0.001 1.533 (1.100–2.137) 0.012
Macrovascular invasion
3.495 (2.246–5.440)
<0.001
2.805 (1.756–4.480)
<0.001
Validation cohort—OS
AFU (⩽35 vs >35 u l−1) 4.272 (2.446–7.461) <0.001 2.333 (1.249–4.369) 0.008
Tumour size (⩽5 vs >5 cm) 4.292 (2.246–8.202) <0.001 2.081 (1.019–4.250) 0.044
GGT (⩽64 vs >64 u l−1) 2.765 (1.622–4.712) <0.001 1.500 (0.846–2.661) 0.165
AFP (⩽400 vs >400 ng ml−1) 2.112 (1.329–3.357) <0.001 1.642 (1.022–2.639) 0.040
Macrovascular invasion 4.615 (2.747–7.754) <0.001 2.352 (1.289–4.289) 0.005
ALP (⩽129 vs >129 u l−1)
2.063 (1.271–3.348)
0.003
1.095 (0.626–1.915)
0.751
Two data sets merging—RFS
AFU (⩽35 vs >35 u l−1) 1.782 (1.509–2.104) <0.001 1.369 (1.134–1.653) 0.001
Tumour size (⩽5 vs >5 cm) 1.729 (1.464–2.042) <0.001 1.387 (1.147–1.677) 0.001
GGT (⩽64 vs >64 u l−1) 1.524 (1.291–1.801) <0.001 1.238 (1.028–1.489) 0.024
AFP (⩽400 vs >400 ng ml−1) 1.354 (1.153–1.590) <0.001 1.102 (0.930–1.307) 0.261
Macrovascular invasion 1.827 (1.453–2.297) <0.001 1.516 (1.195–1.924) 0.001
ALP (⩽129 vs >129 u l−1)
1.244 (1.041–1.487)
0.016
0.963 (0.795–1.166)
0.700
Two data sets merging—OS
AFU (⩽35 vs >35 u l−1) 2.500 (2.049–3.050) <0.001 1.724 (1.376–2.160) <0.001
Tumour size (⩽5 vs >5 cm) 2.229 (1.808–2.747) <0.001 1.563 (1.239–1.972) <0.001
GGT (⩽64 vs >64 u l−1) 1.929 (1.564–2.380) <0.001 1.198 (0.945–1.519) 0.136
AFP (⩽400 vs >400 ng ml−1) 1.664 (1.371–2.020) <0.001 1.238 (1.010–1.518) 0.040
Macrovascular invasion 2.863 (2.237–3.664) <0.001 2.018 (1.557–2.615) <0.001
ALP (⩽129 vs >129 u l−1) 1.636 (1.334–2.007) <0.001 1.158 (0.930–1.442) 0.189
TB (⩽18.8 vs >18.8 mmol l−1) 1.432 (1.173–1.748) <0.001 1.380 (1.127–1.690) 0.002
Liver cirrhosis (yes vs no) 1.326 (1.043–1.687) 0.021 1.211 (0.949–1.547) 0.124

Abbreviations: A=absence; AFP=alpha-fetoprotein; AFU=alpha-fucosidase; ALP=alkaline phosphatase; 95% CI=95% confidence interval; GGT=γ-glutamyl transpeptidase; HR=hazard ratio; OS=overall survival; P=presence; RFS=recurrence-free survival; TB=total bilirubin.

Macrovascular invasion, P vs A.

The clinicopathologic variables were adopted for their prognostic significance by univariate analyses.