Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 11;110(7):1878–1890. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.29

Table 3. Subgroup analyses for evaluating clinicopathologic characteristics of endometriosis-associated ovarian cancer.

 
 
 
 
Heterogeneity
 
Category No. of studies with references RR 95% CI P I2 Model used
FIGO stage I–II disease
Study design
 Case–control 2 1.983 1.683–2.336 0.973 0 Fixed effect
 Cohort
4
1.920
1.020–3.616
<0.001
91.975
Radom effects
Adjustment for potential confounding factors
 Age
5
1.973
1.297–3.003
<0.001
89.656
Random effects
Grade 1 disease
Study design
 Case–control
14
1.354
1.169–1.568
0.743
0
Fixed effect
Quality of study (NOS)
 ⩾7 11 1.328 1.155–1.528 0.456 0 Fixed effect
 <7
4
1.087
0.518–2.280
0.963
0
Fixed effect
Assessment of endometriosis
 Histology 3 1.801 0.898–3.610 0.063 63.872 Random effects
 Self-report
12
1.303
1.121–1.515
0.945
0
Fixed effect
Adjustment for potential confounding factors
 Two factorsa 13 1.330 1.147–1.543 0.858 0 Fixed effect
 Eight factorsb
12
1.303
1.121–1.515
0.945
0
Fixed effect
Nulliparity
Assessment of endometriosis
 Histology
3
1.648
1.212–2.241
0.150
47.262
Fixed effect
Adjustment for potential confounding factors
 Age
3
1.319
1.237–1.407
0.308
15.038
Fixed effect
Optimal debulking surgery
Study design
 Case–control 2 1.739 0.630–4.799 <0.001 97.838 Random effects
 Cohort
3
1.147
0.973–1.352
0.239
30.192
Fixed effect
Adjustment for potential confounding factors
 Age 4 1.376 0.827–2.290 <0.001 94.729 Random effects

Abbreviations: CI=confidence interval; FIGO= International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; NOS=Newcastle–Ottawa Scale; RR=risk ratio.

a

Adjusted for age and race.

b

Age, body mass index, breastfeeding, family history of ovarian cancer, history of tubal ligation, parity, race, and use of oral contraceptive.