Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 4;110(7):1778–1784. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.71

Table 1. Evaluation of prognostic role of endothelial CD105 on OS and DFS in univariate and multivariate analyses.

 
Crude estimates
Adjusted estimates
  HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
OS in all cohort (Patients n=102)
Age 1.01 0.98–1.04 0.71      
Sex (M/F) 1.72 0.70–4.24 0.24      
Stage (M1/M0) 3.81 1.71–8.45 0.001 2.19 0.92–5.20 0.075
CD105 tertiles (3rd/2nd/1st)
0.41
0.25–0.69
<0.001
0.48
0.28–0.85
0.011*
DFS (Patients n=87)
Age 1.02 0.98–1.05 0.44      
Sex (M/F) 2.73 0.79–9.46 0.11      
Leibovich risk groups (Low/intermediate/high) 4.23 2.19–8.17 <0.001 3.84 1.93–7.62 <0.001*
CD105 Tertiles (3rd/2nd/1st) 0.46 0.25–0.83 0.010 0.65 0.33–1.30 0.224

Abbreviations: CD105=cluster of differentiation molecule 105; CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; F=female; HR=hazard ratio; M=male; M0=non-metastatic group; M1=metastatic group; OS=overall survival

*P<0.05 (statistically significant difference).