Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 4;110(7):1778–1784. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.71

Table 2. Evaluation of prognostic role of tumoral CD105 on OS and DFS in univariate and multivariate analyses.

 
Crude estimates
Adjusted estimates
  HR (95% CI) P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
OS in all cohort (Patients n=102)
Age 1.01 0.98–1.04 0.71      
Sex (M/F) 1.72 0.70–4.24 0.24      
Stage (M1/M0) 3.81 1.71–8.45 0.001 2.27 0.95–5.42 0.066
Tumoral CD105 (Positive/negative)
4.82
2.23–4.82
<0.001
3.76
1.63–8.66
0.002*
DFS (Patients n=87)
Age 1.02 0.98–1.05 0.44      
Sex (M/F) 2.73 0.79–9.46 0.11      
Leibovich risk groups (Low/intermediate/high) 4.23 2.19–8.17 <0.001 3.21 1.54–6.66 0.002*
Tumoral CD105 (Positive/negative) 7.37 2.88–18.9 <0.001 2.82 0.99–8.05 0.053

Abbreviations: CD105=cluster of differentiation molecule 105; CI=confidence interval; DFS=disease-free survival; F=female; HR=hazard ratio; M=male; M0=non-metastatic group; M1=metastatic group; OS=overall survival.

*P<0.05 (statistically significant difference).