Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Inorganica Chim Acta. 2014 Mar 1;412:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ica.2013.12.006

Table 1.

Crystal data and structure refinement for synthesized cyanoximes.

H(MCO), 5 H(PiPCO), 2
Empirical formula C7 H9 N3 O3 C8 H11 N3 O2
Formula weight 181.20 183.17
Temperature 120(2) K 120(2) K
Wavelength, Mo 0.71073 Å 0.71073 Å
Crystal system Orthorhombic Monoclinic
Space group P 21 21 21 P 21/c
Unit cell dimensions a = 6.7259(4) Å a = 6.3513(16) Å.
b = 9.4836(6) Å b = 13.942(4) Å
c = 13.2127(9) Å c = 10.580(3) Å
α= 90° α= 90°
β= 90° β= 95.003(3)°
γ = 90° γ = 90°
Volume 842.78(9) Å3 909.2(2) Å3
Z 4 4
Density (calculated), Mg/m3 1.444 1.324
Absorption coefficient, mm−1 0.115 0.098
F(000) 384 384
Crystal size, mm 0.56 × 0.37 × 0.31 0.51 × 0.32 × 0.18
Index ranges −9<=h<=9 −8<=h<=8
−12<=k<=12 −19<=k<=19
−18<=l<=18 −14<=l<=14
Reflections collected 10780 12040
Independent reflections 2200 [R(int) = 0.0275] 2512 [R(int) = 0.0381]
Refinement method Full-matrix least-squares on F2
Data / restraints / parameters 2200 / 0 / 118 2512 / 4 / 145
Goodness-of-fit on F2 1.052 1.039
Final R indices [I>2σ (I)] R1=0.0308, wR2=0.0761 R =0.050, wR2=0.1062
R indices (all data) R1=0.0332, wR2=0.0782 R1=0.071, wR2=0.1177
Absolute structure parameter −0.1(9) n/a
Largest diff. peak and hole, e. Å−3 0.262 and −0.195 0.323 and −0.367