Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Aug 1.
Published in final edited form as: AIDS Educ Prev. 2013 Aug;25(4):315–326. doi: 10.1521/aeap.2013.25.4.315

Table 3.

Latent profile analysis for the strategies variable (N=1,231)

Model Log Likelihood df SCF AIC SABIC Entropy LMR-LRT df p BS-LRT df p
Crude
 2 classes −24291.867 34 1.718 48651.735 48717.666 0.868 3090.569 12 0.010 3126.764 12 0.000
 3 classes −23416.015 46 1.403 46924.029 47013.23 0.896 1731.428 12 0.000 1751.706 12 0.000
 4 classes −23023.364 58 1.679 46162.728 46275.199 0.901 776.210 12 0.133 785.301 12 0.000
 5 classes −22752.493 70 1.743 45644.986 45780.727 0.89 535.471 12 0.321 541.742 12 0.000
Adjusted
 2 classes −24219.573 50 1.534 48539.146 48636.104 0.876 3255.015 28 0.017 3271.352 28 0.000
3 classes 23334.096 78 1.366 46824.192 46975.446 0.893 1762.111 28 0.031 1770.956 28 0.000
 4 classes −22908.670 106 1.267 46029.341 46234.891 0.900 846.598 28 0.410 850.847 28 0.000
 5 classes −22615.035 134 1.296 45498.071 45757.917 0.894 584.337 28 0.021 587.270 28 0.000

Note: df=degrees of freedom, SCF=scaling correction factor, AIC=Akaike information criterion, SABIC=sample-size-adjusted Bayesian information criterion, LMR-LRT=Lo-Mendell-Rubin likelihood ratio test, and BS-LRT=bootstrap likelihood ratio test.