Table 7.
Summary of the results from ‘ intervention fidelity ’ studies included in the review (n = 33 studies)
| Barriers | Strategies |
|---|---|
| Concerns regarding: Randomisation, i.e., not getting treatment Loss of control (re: allocation) Mistrust |
• Ensuring minimal standard of care for control group or minimal intervention for controls [29,40] or alternatives to randomised controlled trials [27]. |
| • Use trusted sources of information (e.g. doctor or family) [87]. | |
| • Participant education regarding the benefits of randomisation [73]. | |
| • Including peers and locals in intervention delivery [20,55,58,82,105,108,124]. | |
| Health intervention not culturally appropriate (with community values and beliefs) |
• Community involvement in development, action research method or ‘cultural immersion’ [27,29,31,35,56,67,70,71],[74,77,80,85,107,108,113,114],[118,122]. |
| • Culturally tailored programs [19,29,52,58,68-70,85,88,118]. | |
| Distance for delivery of intervention (rural groups) |
• Group-delivered (one-on-one) telephone intervention [88]. |
| Negative framing of health information, emphasis on disparities | • Positive and progress emphasised in health information [37]*. |
*Indicates good evidence from randomised controlled trial (see also Table 1).