Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 5;21(5):1589–1595. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3602-0

Table 2.

Positive margin status and reexcision lumpectomy procedures

Variable Treatment group Reduction p
Device (n = 298) Control (n = 298)
Positive margins after initial surgery
 All patients 92/298 (30.9 %) 124/298 (41.6 %) 26 % 0.008
 At skin or fascia 15/298 (5.0 %) 18/298 (6.0 %) 0.72
Candidates for reexcision 77/298 (25.8 %) 106/298 (35.9 %) 27 % 0.013
 Due to positive margin on main specimens 47/298 (15.8 %) 97/298 (32.9 %) 52 % <0.001
 Due to positive margin on shavings 30/298 (10.1 %) 9/298 (3.0 %) <0.001
Reexcision lumpectomy procedures 59/298 (19.8 %) 77/298 (25.8 %) 23 % 0.097; 0.018a
 Due to positive margin on main specimens 33/298 (10.0 %) 62/298 (20.8 %) 47 % 0.002
 Due to positive margin on shavings 19/298 (7.4 %) 4/298 (1.3 %) 0.002
 Due to close margins or other considerations 7/298 (2.3 %) 11/298 (3.7 %) 0.47

aAccounting for the difference between arms in the number of main lumpectomy specimens with positive margins (Fig. 2, phase I)