Table 2.
|
Trend in walking/cycling/sportsa (regression coefficient β (95% confidence interval)) |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|
Modelb | Period | Pre intervention | Intervention | Intervention versus pre intervention |
|
District type |
|
|
|
Leisure-time walking |
|
|
|
|
M0 |
Deprived target districts |
−0.04 (−0.08 – 0.00) |
0.11 (0.04 – 0.18)* |
0.15 (0.04 – 0.25)* |
|
Rest of the Netherlands |
−0.00 (−0.01 – 0.00) |
0.02 (0.01 – 0.04)* |
0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)* |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
0.12 (0.02 – 0.22)* |
||
M1 |
Deprived target districts |
−0.04 (−0.08 – 0.01) |
0.11 (0.04 – 0.19)* |
0.15 (0.04 – 0.30)* |
|
Rest of the Netherlands |
−0.00 (−0.01 – 0.00) |
0.02 (0.01 – 0.03)* |
0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)* |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
0.12 (0.02 – 0.23)* |
||
M2 |
Deprived target districts |
−0.04 (−0.08 – 0.00) |
0.11 (0.03 – 0.18)* |
0.14 (0.04 – 0.25)* |
Rest of the Netherlands |
−0.00 (−0.01 – 0.00) |
0.02 (0.01 – 0.03)* |
0.02 (0.00 – 0.04)* |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
0.12 (0.02 – 0.23)* |
|||
Leisure-time cycling |
|
|
|
|
M0 |
Deprived target districts |
0.04 (0.00 – 0.08)* |
0.00 (−0.07 – 0.07) |
−0.04 (−0.14 – 0.06) |
|
Rest of the Netherlands |
0.00 (−0.00 – 0.01) |
0.03 (0.02 – 0.04)* |
0.02 (0.01 – 0.04)* |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
−0.06 (−0.16 – 0.04) |
||
M1 |
Deprived target districts |
0.05 (0.00 – 0.09)* |
0.00 (−0.07 – 0.07) |
−0.04 (−0.14 – 0.06) |
|
Rest of the Netherlands |
0.01 (−0.00 – 0.01) |
0.03 (0.02 – 0.04)* |
0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)* |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
−0.07 (−0.17 – 0.03) |
||
M2 |
Deprived target districts |
0.05 (0.01 – 0.09)* |
−0.00 (−0.07 – 0.07) |
−0.05 (−0.15 – 0.05) |
Rest of the Netherlands |
0.01 (−0.00 – 0.01) |
0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)* |
0.02 (0.00 – 0.04)* |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
−0.07 (−0.17 – 0.03) |
|||
Sports |
|
|
|
|
M0 |
Deprived target districts |
0.02 (−0.02 – 0.06) |
−0.01 (−0.08 – 0.06) |
−0.03 (−0.13 – 0.07) |
|
Rest of the Netherlands |
0.00 (−0.00 – 0.01) |
0.00 (−0.01 – 0.02) |
0.00 (−0.02 – 0.02) |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
−0.03 (−0.13 – 0.07) |
||
M1 |
Deprived target districts |
0.02 (−0.02 – 0.06) |
−0.02 (−0.09 – 0.05) |
−0.04 (−0.14 – 0.07) |
|
Rest of the Netherlands |
0.01 (0.00 – 0.02)* |
0.01 (0.00 – 0.02)* |
0.00 (−0.02 – 0.02) |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
−0.04 (−0.14 – 0.07) |
||
M2 | Deprived target districts |
0.02 (−0.02 – 0.06) |
−0.04 (−0.12 – 0.03) |
−0.06 (−0.17 – 0.04) |
Rest of the Netherlands |
0.00 (−0.00 – 0.01) |
−0.01 (−0.02 – 0.00) |
−0.01 (−0.03 – 0.01) |
|
Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands | −0.05 (−0.16 – 0.06) |
*P ≤ 0.05.
aTrend represents the half yearly change in ln (odds).
bM0: unadjusted. M1: adjusted for age, gender, household composition, ethnicity. M2: additional adjustment for education, income.