Table 3.
Trends in leisure-time physical activity in deprived target districts versus various control groups
| |
Trend in walking/cycling/sportsa (regression coefficient β (95% confidence interval)) |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Period | Pre intervention | Intervention | Intervention versus pre intervention | |
|
District type |
|
|
|
|
|
Leisure-time walking |
|
|
|
|
| Deprived target districts |
−0.04 (−0.08 – 0.00) |
0.11 (0.03 – 0.18)* |
0.14 (0.04 – 0.25)* |
|
| Rest of the Netherlands |
−0.00 (−0.01 – 0.00) |
0.02 (0.01 – 0.03)* |
0.02 (0.00 – 0.04)* |
|
| Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
|
0.12 (0.02 – 0.23)* |
||
| Other deprived districts |
−0.01 (−0.04 – 0.01) |
0.02 (−0.02 – 0.06) |
0.04 (−0.02 – 0.10) |
|
| Deprived target districts versus other deprived districts |
0.11 (−0.01 – 0.23) |
|||
| Other deprived districts, same city |
−0.02 (−0.05 – 0.01) |
0.04 (−0.01 – 0.10) |
0.06 (−0.02 – 0.14) |
|
| Deprived target districts versus other deprived districts, same city |
0.09 (−0.04 – 0.22) |
|||
|
Leisure-time cycling |
|
|
|
|
| Deprived target districts |
0.05 (0.01 – 0.09)* |
−0.00 (−0.07 – 0.07) |
−0.05 (−0.15 – 0.05) |
|
| Rest of the Netherlands |
0.01 (−0.00 – 0.01) |
0.03 (0.01 – 0.04)* |
0.02 (0.00 – 0.04)* |
|
| Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
|
−0.07 (−0.17 – 0.03) |
||
| Other deprived districts |
0.01 (−0.02 – 0.03) |
0.05 (0.01 – 0.09)* |
0.04 (−0.02 – 0.10) |
|
| Deprived target districts versus other deprived districts |
−0.10 (−0.22 – 0.02) |
|||
| Other deprived districts, same city |
0.01 (−0.02 – 0.05) |
0.03 (−0.02 – 0.08) |
0.02 (−0.06 – 0.09) |
|
| Deprived target districts versus other deprived districts, same city |
−0.08 (−0.21 – 0.04) |
|||
|
Sports |
|
|
|
|
| Deprived target districts |
0.02 (−0.02 – 0.06) |
−0.04 (−0.12 – 0.03) |
−0.06 (−0.17 – 0.04) |
|
| Rest of the Netherlands |
0.00 (−0.00 – 0.01) |
−0.01 (−0.02 – 0.00) |
−0.01 (−0.03 – 0.01) |
|
| Deprived target districts versus rest of the Netherlands |
|
−0.05 (−0.16 – 0.06) |
||
| Other deprived districts |
0.00 (−0.02 – 0.03) |
0.01 (−0.04 – 0.05) |
0.00 (−0.06 – 0.07) |
|
| Deprived target districts versus other deprived districts |
−0.05 (−0.18 – 0.07) |
|||
| Other deprived districts, same city |
−0.01 (−0.04 – 0.03) |
−0.01 (−0.07 – 0.04) |
−0.00 (−0.09 – 0.08) |
|
| Deprived target districts versus other deprived districts, same city | −0.05 (−0.18 – 0.08) | |||
*P ≤ 0.05.
aTrend represents the half yearly change in ln (odds), adjusted for age, gender, household composition, ethnicity, education, and income.