Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 May 1.
Published in final edited form as: Aerosol Sci Technol. 2014 Mar 28;48(5):489–497. doi: 10.1080/02786826.2014.891722

Table 1.

Pairwise comparisons of mass-normalized DTT consumption rate estimates for each method, separated by concentration level.

Concentration Level Method Mean Reactivity ± SE (pmol DTT/min/μgpm) P-value*
High On-line 86.5 ± 10.4 0.22
Traditional 66.0 ± 12.2
Middle On-line 94.7 ± 10.0 0.33
Traditional 110.5 ± 12.2
Low On-line 96.9 ± 11.7 0.10
Traditional 64.7 ± 12.2
Combined On-line 92.7 ± 5.7 0.20
Traditional 80.3 ± 7.1
*

P-values were estimated with two-tailed t-tests of difference in means between the two systems.