Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct 2;125:94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.011

Figure 1. Screenshot of a Portion of the CAPI Interface Used by NSHAP Respondents to Match Their W1 Network Members to Their W2 Network Members.

Figure 1

Note: The names that appeared in the original screenshot of the rosters above have been replaced with pseudonyms. The names of and other information concerning respondents’ network members at W1 were preloaded from their original W1 surveys in the CATI system, which was programmed to display a visual representation linking matches between the respondent’s W1 and W2 rosters. Respondents were asked to confirm that any changes in network personnel were depicted correctly. The exercise included names of the up to five confidants who were listed at W1 (Roster A), any spouse/partner whom the respondent did not name first as a confidant (Roster B), and one other “especially close” contact who had not yet been named (Roster C).