Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct 2;125:94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.011

Appendix Table A1.

Odds Ratios from Logistic Regression Models Predicting the Number of ADLs with Which Respondents Reported Having at Least Some Difficulty (N = 2,142)

Predictor At Least One Problematic ADL At Least Two Problematic ADLs
W1 network size (reference = 1)
 Two 1.116 (.333) 1.203 (.394)
 Three 1.099 (.365) 1.421 (.539)
 Four .899 (.337) 1.253 (.605)
 Five 1.398 (.482) 2.167 (.865)
Confidants lost (reference = zero)
 One 1.488 (.317) 1.779* (.441)
 Two 1.456 (.403) 1.295 (.321)
 Three 2.082* (.693) 1.998 (.732)
 Four 1.706 (.588) 1.447 (.509)
 Five 3.138* (1.529) 4.578** (2.351)
Confidants added (reference = zero)
 One .798 (.155) .810 (.236)
 Two .718 (.149) .631 (.178)
 Three .508* (.143) .594 (.174)
 Four .577 (.190) .416* (.159)
 Five .560 (.259) .555 (.301)
Constant .008 (.013) .008 (.013)
Pseudo R2 .320 .320

p < .10

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001 (two-sided tests)

a

Estimates are weighted using NSHAP W1 person-weights (adjusted for attrition and selection at W2).

All models are survey-adjusted and include all of the same covariates and controls that were employed in the analysis that is presented in Table 2.