Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct 2;125:94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.011

Appendix Table A3.

Incidence Rate Ratios from Poisson Regression Models Predicting the Number of Confidants Lost and Added between Waves (N = 2,140)

Predictor Number lost Number added
W1 functional impairment (logged) 1.114 (.083) 1.033 (.120)
W1 self-rated health (reference = “poor”)
 Fair .954 (.076) .953 (.075)
 Good .988 (.079) .997 (.093)
 Very good .967 (.088) .936 (.094)
 Excellent .982 (.095) 1.040 (.104)
W1 depressive symptoms (logged) 1.067 (.080) 1.030 (.094)
Change in (logged) functional impairment 1.103) (.086) (.088) (.098)
Change in self-rated health 1.000 (.019) 1.018 (.026)
Change in (logged) depressive symptoms 1.016 (.053) .936 (.065)
Pseudo R2 b .469 .085

p < .10

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01,

***

p < .001 (two-sided tests)

a

Estimates are weighted using NSHAP W1 person-weights (adjusted for attrition and selection at W2).

All models are survey-adjusted and include all of the same covariates and controls that were employed in the analyses presented in Tables 24, except for other measures of network change.

b

Represents the squared correlation between respondents’ observed number of confidants lost/added and the corresponding predicted values.