Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2013 Oct 2;125:94–106. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.09.011

Appendix Table A4.

Alter-Level Measures Describing Stable, Lost, and New Confidant Ties (Unweighted)a

Measureb Average Values for:
Stable Confidants, at:
“Lost” Confidants (N = 3,609) “New” Confidants (N = 4,112)
W1 (N = 4,005) W2 (N = 4,005)
Kin relationship .78 (.42) .78 (.41) .52 (.50) .50 (.50)
Coresident status .24 (.43) .25 (.43) .11 (.31) .07 (.25)
Emotional closeness to alters (1 – 4) 3.32 (.67) 3.29 (.66) 2.91 (.77) 2.80 (.74)
Frequency of contact with alters (1 – 8) 7.07 (1.11) 7.02 (1.15) 6.43 (1.41) 6.41 (1.38)
Likelihood of discussing health with alters (1 – 3) 2.72 (.56) 2.72 (.55) 2.40 (.75) 2.37 (.76)
Frequency of contact between alters (0–8) 4.54 (2.01) 4.45 (2.00) 3.65 (2.19) 3.69 (2.16)
Length of time ego has known alters (1–4) -- -- -- 3.69 (.68)
a

Estimates are drawn from all respondents for whom valid data were available for a given variable, ignoring those who had any trouble with the roster matching exercise and/or who had missing data on any alter. Standard deviations appear in parentheses below the relevant measure.

b

All estimtes refer to confidants (Roster A) only. “Lost” in this case refers to all confidants who were listed in Roster A at W1 but not at W2, while “new” confidants include any alters who were not included in Roster A at W1 but were at W2.