Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2013 Apr 1;5(2):1–28. doi: 10.1257/app.5.2.1

Table 7.

Parental Employment Before and After Casino Operations: Indiviudal Fixed-Effects Panel Regressions

Mother
Father
Variables Employed
(1)
Employed
in the home
(2)
Unemployed
(3)
Employed
(4)
Employed
in the home
(5)
Unemployed
(6)
Household eligible for casino disbursement 0.109 −0.0521 −0.0638 −0.00652 −0.0171 −0.0372
(0.102) (0.0778) (0.0853) (0.0936) (0.0124) (0.0500)
Interaction of casino × average household income −0.00737 0.00310 0.00483 −0.0179 0.00386 −0.00355
(0.0112) (0.00880) (0.00587) (0.0110) (0.00325) (0.00659)
Constant 1.212*** −0.0374 0.0257 0.931*** −0.0472 −0.0130
(0.221) (0.156) (0.159) (0.166) (0.0475) (0.0813)
Observations 2,084 2,084 2,084 2,083 2,083 2,083
R2 0.012 0.035 0.010 0.020 0.018 0.009
Number of individuals 1,079 1,079 1,079 1,080 1,080 1,080

Notes: Included in all specifications but not reported are: separate trend variables for one- and two-Native American parent households, number of children less than six years of age, age by race dummy variables, and a Native American-specific time trend. Household income is a categorical variable where each bin is $5,000 in size. The lowest category, for instance, goes from 0 to $5,000. The second bin goes from $5,001 to $10,000, etc. Clustered standard errors at the individual level in parentheses.

***

Significant at the 1 percent level.

**

Significant at the 5 percent level.

*

Significant at the 10 percent level.