Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 4.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Appl Econ. 2013 Apr 1;5(2):1–28. doi: 10.1257/app.5.2.1

Table 8.

Potential Mechanisms Used in Weight Loss: Individual Fixed-Effects Panel Regressions

Variables Reduced
appetite
(1)
Weight loss
in last
3 mos.
(2)
Bulimic
(3)
Exercise
to lose
weight?
(4)
Using
appetite
suppressants?
(4)
Dieting
to lose
weight?
(6)
Household eligible for casino disbursement −0.025 −0.150 −0.055 −0.145 −0.105 −0.013
(0.109) (0.13) (0.059) (0.112) (0.089) (0.045)
Interaction of casino × average household income 0.004 0.016 0.005 0.015 0.009 0.000
(0.015) (0.018) (0.008) (0.014) (0.009) (0.006)
Constant 0.095 0.940** 0.241*** 0.220*** 0.042** 0.068***
(0.246) (0.365) (0.023) (0.040) (0.018) (0.012)
Observations 4,574 4,565 4,579 4,578 2,827 4,581
R2 0.0107 0.00930 0.00880 0.00800 0.00974 0.00431
Number of individuals 1,266 1,266 1,268 1,267 1,215 1,268

Notes: Included in all specifications but not reported are: separate trend variables for one- and two-Native American parent households, number of children less than six years of age, age by race dummy variables, and a Native American-specific time trend. Household income is a categorical variable where each bin is $5,000 in size. The lowest category, for instance, goes from 0 to $5,000. The second bin goes from $5,001 to $10,000, etc. Clustered standard errors at the individual level in parentheses.

***

Significant at the 1 percent level.

**

Significant at the 5 percent level.

*

Significant at the 10 percent level.