Skip to main content
. 2014 Feb 4;31(4):1517–1522. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3011

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Prostate calcification analysis. The number and position of the prostate calcifications were not evaluated in the present study. (A) When prostate calcification and the FDG uptake area overlapped in less than 40% of the areas, the cases were defined as ‘uptake not coexisting with calcification’. (B) The other cases, i.e. 40% or more of overlapped areas, were defined as ‘uptake coexisting with calcification’.