Table 5.
Results of the MANOVA for KIDSCREEN-10 and SDQ
| Variable | Comparison |
KIDSCREEN-10 |
SDQ |
Df | F | Wilks’ λ (p) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coef. | P > |t| | Coef. | P > |t| | |||||
|
Gender |
Girl vs. boy |
-0.28 |
0.001 |
-0.27 |
0.001 |
1 |
7.33 |
0.976 (<0.001) |
|
Family type |
Single-parent vs. classic |
-0.09 |
0.205 |
-0.13 |
0.079 |
2 |
1.46 |
0.997 (0.211) |
| Reconstituted vs. classic |
-0.16 |
0.095 |
-0.14 |
0.167 |
||||
|
Perceived material welfare |
Fine vs. very good |
-0.14 |
0.036 |
-0.15 |
0.030 |
3 |
7.77 |
0.973 (<0.001) |
| Average vs. very good |
-0.34 |
<0.001 |
-0.28 |
<0.001 |
||||
| Bad/worse vs. very good |
-0.49 |
<0.001 |
-0.54 |
<0.001 |
||||
|
Number of friends (both sexes) |
None vs. 3+ |
-0.59 |
0.021 |
-0.59 |
0.023 |
2 |
6.23 |
0.985 (<0.001) |
| 1-2 vs. 3+ |
-0.31 |
<0.001 |
-0.22 |
0.003 |
||||
|
School type |
Technical vs. gymnasiums |
0.12 |
0.018 |
-0.09 |
0.096 |
2 |
11.30 |
0.974 (<0.001) |
| Industrials vs. gymnasiums |
0.18 |
0.006 |
-0.25 |
<0.001 |
||||
|
Parent’s employment |
Only one employed vs. both employed |
-0.01 |
0.803 |
0.07 |
0.273 |
2 |
0.71 |
0.998 (0.585) |
| Both unemployed vs. both employed |
0.09 |
0.516 |
0.19 |
0.889 |
||||
|
FAS |
Low vs. high |
-0.08 |
0.309 |
-0.08 |
0.296 |
2 |
0.47 |
0.999 (0.760) |
| Middle vs. high | 0.00 | 0.949 | 0.00 | 0.998 | ||||