Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2014 Feb 5;23(4):601–610. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-13-1085

Table 3.

Results from bivariate and multivariate analysis to assess the degree of screening compliance by baseline factors and intervention group (N=632)

Subject Characteristic Bivariate Analysis Hazard Ratio (95% C.I.) (p-value) Multivariate Analysis Hazard Ratio (95% C.I.) (p-value)

Age (yrs)
 25–39 1.00 -
 40–49 0.96 (0.52, 1.76)
 50–64 1.14 (0.64, 2.05)
 65+ 1.28 (0.70, 2.33)

Male gender 0.86 (0.69, 1.08) -

Education
 No college (vs. some college or more) 1.14 (0.88, 1.48) -

No doctor 0.54 (0.30, 0.96)
(0.02)
-

No insurance 0.55 (0.27, 1.14) -

Risk group – HNPCC (vs. HR) 1.15 (0.91, 1.45) -

Ever had colonoscopy 1.74 (1.27, 2.38)
(0.0003)
1.47 (1.06, 2.04)
(0.02)

Adherent at baseline 1.08 (0.87, 1.34) -

Plan on having colonoscopy in 1–2 years 2.98 (2.37, 3.75)
(<0.0001)
2.90 (2.30, 3.65)
(<0.0001)

Risk perception is higher than others without family history 1.73 (1.27, 2.35)
(0.0003)
-

Knowledge of risk appropriate recommendations 1.33 (1.07, 1.65)
(0.01)
-

Reported barriers to CRC screening Any barrier (yes vs. no) 0.73 (0.58, 0.92)
(0.007)
-

Intervention Arm – Intensive 1.24 (1.01, 1.55)
(0.04)
1.32 (1.07, 1.64)
(0.01)

Adjusted for all variables with significance level of p < 0.05 in multivariate model