Table 3.
Dependance of the optimal q and noAP values on the algorithm type and parameter K.
| K | q | noAP (dBm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | KNN | 1.1 | −77 |
| KWNN | 1.1 | −77 | |
|
| |||
| 3 | KNN | 1.42 | −87 |
| KWNN | 2 | −87 | |
|
| |||
| 4 | KNN | 1.42 | −87 |
| KWNN | 2 | −82 | |
|
| |||
| 5 | KNN | 1.41 | −87 |
| KWNN | 2 | −87 | |
Dependance of the optimal q and noAP values on the algorithm type and parameter K.
| K | q | noAP (dBm) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | KNN | 1.1 | −77 |
| KWNN | 1.1 | −77 | |
|
| |||
| 3 | KNN | 1.42 | −87 |
| KWNN | 2 | −87 | |
|
| |||
| 4 | KNN | 1.42 | −87 |
| KWNN | 2 | −82 | |
|
| |||
| 5 | KNN | 1.41 | −87 |
| KWNN | 2 | −87 | |