Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Oct 5;47(6):1078–1090. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.07.004

Table 2.

Adjusted Associationsa of Clinical Trial Enrollment With Terminal Illness Acknowledgment, EOL Care Preferences, and Advance Care Planning; N = 358

Total Enrollment in Trial Unadjusted Analyses Adjusted Analyses

n/N (%) Yes; n=37 No; n=321 OR (95% CI) P-value OR (95% CI) P-value
Terminal illness acknowledgment 125/322 (38.8) 9 (27.3) 116 (40.1) 0.56 (0.25,1.25) 0.155 0.72 (0.30, 1.71) 0.458
Desires prognostic information 236/326 (72.4) 16 (50.0) 220 (74.8) 0.34 (0.16, 0.71) 0.004 0.37 (0.18, 0.79) 0.01
Values life-extension over comfort 83/290 (28.6) 14 (48.3) 69 (26.4) 2.60 (1.19, 5.66) 0.016 2.02 (0.86, 4.75) 0.108
EOL discussion 151/357 (42.3) 6 (16.2) 145 (45.3) 0.23 (0.09, 0.58) 0.002 0.30 (0.11, 0.78) 0.014
DNR order 138/323 (42.7) 8 (25.0) 130 (44.7) 0.41 (0.18, 0.95) 0.037 0.51 (0.20, 1.26) 0.142
Living will or health care proxy 181/321 (56.4) 18 (54.5) 163 (56.6) 0.92 (0.45, 1.90) 0.821 0.77 (0.35, 1.73) 0.532
a

Analyses were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical confounders. Covariates of age, gender, income, marital status, insurance, education, race/ethnicity, religion, recruitment site, cancer type, performance status, Charlson Comorbidity Index, McGill QOL and subscales, coping, and religious coping were entered into models when related to clinical trial enrollment and the outcome of interest with P<0.10, and were retained in the model when remaining significant with P<0.05.