Skip to main content
. 2014 Mar 17;2014:731296. doi: 10.1155/2014/731296

Table 1.

Comparison of clinical parameters according to arterial microcalcification.

Clinical parameters All patients (n = 82)
number (%)
AMiC-negative (n = 49)
number (%)
AMiC-positive (n = 33)
number (%)
P
Age (years)1
 Mean ± SD 58.9 ± 14.6 54.8 ± 15.9 64.8 ± 10.1 0.002
Sex
 Men 43 (52.4) 25 (51.0) 18 (54.5) 0.754
 Women 39 (47.6) 24 (49.0) 15 (45.5)
BMI (kg/m2)2
 Mean ± SD 23.5 ± 3.3 23.4 ± 3.4 23.5 ± 3.3 0.863
Chronic kidney disease
 Diabetes 44 (53.7) 16 (32.7) 28 (84.8) 0.001
 Nondiabetes 38 (46.3) 33 (67.3) 5 (15.2)
Dialysis prior to vascular access creation 67 (81.7) 39 (79.6) 28 (84.8) 0.546
HD duration before Op1
 Mean ± SD (months) 2.5 ± 7.8 1.7 ± 5.1 3.5 ± 10.6 0.304
Kt/V2 1.42 ± 0.25 1.41 ± 0.22 1.43 ± 0.28 0.770
Residual renal function1 (mL/min) 4.92 ± 4.62 4.25 ± 4.05 5.90 ± 5.30 0.114
Phosphate binder
 Calcium 57 (69.5) 32 (65.3) 25 (75.8) 0.313
 Noncalcium 14 (17.1) 8 (16.3) 6 (18.2) 0.827
Vitamin D 19 (23.2) 14 (28.6) 5 (15.2) 0.158
Lipid-lowering agents 27 (32.9) 14 (28.6) 13 (39.3) 0.306

AMiC: arterial microcalcification; BMI: body mass index; HD: hemodialysis; Op: operation for vascular access.

1These parameters were compared using Mann-Whitney U test and 2these parameters were compared using Student's t-test.