Table 2. Odds ratios of BMI or height for cIMTa at 60-64 years in the upper quartile versus lower three quartiles: estimates from logistic regression models stratified by anthropometric exposure and sex.
| Male | Female | Male and female | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| Nb | ~1 SD | OR (95% CI) P-value | Nb | ~1 SD | OR (95% CI) P-value | P-value for Z-score-by-sexc | |
| Weight Z-scored | |||||||
| Zwt0yr | 147/456 | 0.5 kg | 0.938 (0.769, 1.144) 0.5 | 164/502 | 0.5 kg | 0.977 (0.803, 1.190) 0.8 | 0.8 |
| BMI Z-scored | |||||||
| Zbmi2yr | 118/357 | 2.3 kg/m2 | 1.137 (0.918, 1.408) 0.2 | 130/390 | 2.3 kg/m2 | 1.106 (0.901, 1.357) 0.3 | 0.8 |
| Zbmi4yr | 126/403 | 1.7 kg/m2 | 1.256 (1.026, 1.538) 0.03 | 150/431 | 1.6 kg/m2 | 0.992 (0.818, 1.204) 0.9 | 0.1 |
| Zbmi6yr | 113/356 | 1.3 kg/m2 | 1.189 (0.956, 1.479) 0.1 | 129/406 | 1.4 kg/m2 | 0.954 (0.774, 1.176) 0.7 | 0.2 |
| Zbmi7yr | 115/374 | 1.2 kg/m2 | 0.989 (0.787, 1.245) 0.9 | 129/423 | 1.5 kg/m2 | 0.881 (0.720, 1.078) 0.2 | 0.5 |
| Zbmi11yr | 123/363 | 2.0 kg/m2 | 1.058 (0.863, 1.297) 0.6 | 136/422 | 2.4 kg/m2 | 0.941 (0.772, 1.147) 0.5 | 0.4 |
| Zbmi15yr | 109/357 | 2.3 kg/m2 | 1.204 (0.958, 1.512) 0.1 | 125/386 | 2.7 kg/m2 | 0.947 (0.762, 1.176) 0.6 | 0.1 |
| Zbmi20yr | 113/372 | 2.3 kg/m2 | 1.282 (1.022, 1.609) 0.03 | 141/432 | 2.7 kg/m2 | 1.036 (0.847, 1.267) 0.7 | 0.2 |
| Zbmi60-64yr | 146/450 | 3.7 kg/m2 | 1.373 (1.114, 1.692) 0.03 | 166/500 | 4.7 kg/m2 | 1.114 (0.921, 1.349) 0.3 | 0.1 |
| Height Z-scored | |||||||
| Zht2yr | 120/371 | 4.9 cm | 0.890 (0.718, 1.102) 0.3 | 140/401 | 4.5 cm | 0.998 (0.815, 1.222) >0.9 | 0.4 |
| Zht4yr | 127/406 | 4.9 cm | 0.780 (0.631, 0.964) 0.02 | 152/439 | 4.8 cm | 0.982 (0.805, 1.198) 0.9 | 0.1 |
| Zht6yr | 120/375 | 5.1 cm | 0.874 (0.706, 1.082) 0.2 | 135/420 | 5.0 cm | 1.072 (0.870, 1.320) 0.5 | 0.2 |
| Zht7yr | 117/388 | 5.3 cm | 0.950 (0.766, 1.178) 0.6 | 136/437 | 5.4 cm | 1.061 (0.864, 1.301) >0.6 | 0.5 |
| Zht11yr | 124/367 | 6.6 cm | 1.039 (0.841, 1.283) 0.7 | 139/425 | 6.9 cm | 1.006 (0.825, 1.226) >0.9 | 0.8 |
| Zht15yr | 112/362 | 8.8 cm | 1.022 (0.826, 1.265) 0.8 | 125/392 | 5.8 cm | 0.925 (0.746, 1.148) 0.5 | 0.5 |
| Zht36yr | 135/409 | 6.5 cm | 0.894 (0.733, 1.090) 0.3 | 157/454 | 5.7 cm | 1.087 (0.893, 1.324) 0.4 | 0.2 |
| Zht60-64yr | 146/450 | 6.5 cm | 0.885 (0.733, 1.069) 0.1 | 166/500 | 5.7 cm | 1.055 (0.879, 1.265) 0.6 | 0.2 |
cIMT carotid intima-media thickness; BMI body mass index; OR odds ratio; CI confidence interval; SD standard deviation
cIMT was taken as the average of six repeat measurements (three on the left hand side of the body and three on the right hand side of the body) at the lateral view of the common carotid artery. Sex-stratified centiles were used to create the two groups (i.e., upper quartile and lower three quartiles).
N in upper quartile / N in lower three quartiles (of carotid intima-media thickness).
From logistic regression models including Z-score, sex (referent: male), and Z-score by-sex.
Z-scores were created internally using the LMS method, stratified by sex and age (0-5, 6-15, 20-64 years).