Skip to main content
. 2014 Apr 7;9(4):e93442. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093442

Table 3. Methodological quality scores of CT studies with an overall quality score of ≥60%.

First author Year Topic Study design Measure Statistics Score
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
Ras 1997 sagittal position maxilla Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o 75%
Van der Meij 2001 bone graft quantity Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic o 69%
Kawakami 2003 bone graft height, density Inline graphic o o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o 69%
Van der Meij 2003 bone graft Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . o Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic 77%
Kita 2004 need bone graft Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . o Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic 77%
Schliephake 2006 maxillary arch width Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . o Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic o 62%
Kim 2008 bone graft size, volume Inline graphic o o Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic . Inline graphic . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o 77%
Suri 2008 midface, maxilla Inline graphic o o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o 66%
Alonso 2010 bone graft size, volume Inline graphic o o o Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o 73%
Saijo 2010 ossification pal suture Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic . 70%
Lee 2011 pterygomaxillary region Inline graphic o o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic o Inline graphic . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o 62%
Li 2011 maxilla Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o 75%
Tulunoglu 2011 cephalometry 2d vs 3D Inline graphic o o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic . Inline graphic . Inline graphic o 63%
Choi 2012 ossification pal suture Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . o . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o 67%
Seike 2012 bone graft size, density Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic . o . Inline graphic . o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic o 60%
Ye 2012 palatal shelf elevation Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic Inline graphic o . Inline graphic . Inline graphic Inline graphic Inline graphic o Inline graphic o 69%

Inline graphic = Fulfilled satisfactorily the methodological criteria;

o = Did not fulfill the methodological criteria;

. = Not applicable.