Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2014 Apr 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Abnorm Child Psychol. 2009 Oct;37(7):945–956. doi: 10.1007/s10802-009-9321-5

Table 3. Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Proactive Aggression.

Variable B (SE)B t-value
Model 1:
Step 1
Reactive Aggression −1.15 .50 −2.27*
Reactive Aggression2 .71 .21 3.33**
Full Scale IQ .00 .00 −.19
Step 2
Hostile Encoding −.19 .18 −1.03
Hostile Att. Bias −.25 .16 −1.51
Planning Ability −.03 .05 −.58
Step 3 (Individually)
Hostile Encoding × Planning Ability .03 .28 .10
Hostile Att. Bias × Planning Ability −.56 .25 −2.29*
Model 2:
Step 1
Reactive Aggression −1.15 .50 −2.27*
Reactive Aggression2 .71 .21 3.33**
Full Scale IQ .00 .00 −.19
Step 2
Hostile Att. Bias −.24 .16 −1.46
Response Inhibition −.04 .04 −.93
Step 3 (Individually)
Hostile Encoding × Response Inhibition −.19 .33 −.59
Hostile Att. Bias × Response Inhibition −.23 .27 −.85
Model 3:
Step 1
Reactive Aggression −1.15 .52 −2.22*
Reactive Aggression2 .71 .22 3.27**
Full Scale IQ −.00 .00 −.28
Step 2
Hostile Encoding −.21 .17 −1.23
Hostile Att. Bias −.26 .17 −1.56
Set Switching .05 .05 .95
Step 3 (Individually)
 Hostile Encoding × Set Switching .53 .33 1.60
 Hostile Att. Bias × Set Switching .03 .36 .08

Note.

+

p < .10,

*

p < .05,

**

p < .01.

Reactive Aggression2 = the quadratic term for reactive aggression. Although interaction analyses are simultaneously depicted in step 3 of each model, each interaction analysis was conducted individually at step 3.