Table 3. Summary of Hierarchical Regression Analysis for Variables Predicting Proactive Aggression.
Variable | B | (SE)B | t-value |
---|---|---|---|
Model 1: | |||
Step 1 | |||
Reactive Aggression | −1.15 | .50 | −2.27* |
Reactive Aggression2 | .71 | .21 | 3.33** |
Full Scale IQ | .00 | .00 | −.19 |
Step 2 | |||
Hostile Encoding | −.19 | .18 | −1.03 |
Hostile Att. Bias | −.25 | .16 | −1.51 |
Planning Ability | −.03 | .05 | −.58 |
Step 3 (Individually) | |||
Hostile Encoding × Planning Ability | .03 | .28 | .10 |
Hostile Att. Bias × Planning Ability | −.56 | .25 | −2.29* |
Model 2: | |||
Step 1 | |||
Reactive Aggression | −1.15 | .50 | −2.27* |
Reactive Aggression2 | .71 | .21 | 3.33** |
Full Scale IQ | .00 | .00 | −.19 |
Step 2 | |||
Hostile Att. Bias | −.24 | .16 | −1.46 |
Response Inhibition | −.04 | .04 | −.93 |
Step 3 (Individually) | |||
Hostile Encoding × Response Inhibition | −.19 | .33 | −.59 |
Hostile Att. Bias × Response Inhibition | −.23 | .27 | −.85 |
Model 3: | |||
Step 1 | |||
Reactive Aggression | −1.15 | .52 | −2.22* |
Reactive Aggression2 | .71 | .22 | 3.27** |
Full Scale IQ | −.00 | .00 | −.28 |
Step 2 | |||
Hostile Encoding | −.21 | .17 | −1.23 |
Hostile Att. Bias | −.26 | .17 | −1.56 |
Set Switching | .05 | .05 | .95 |
Step 3 (Individually) | |||
Hostile Encoding × Set Switching | .53 | .33 | 1.60 |
Hostile Att. Bias × Set Switching | .03 | .36 | .08 |
Note.
p < .10,
p < .05,
p < .01.
Reactive Aggression2 = the quadratic term for reactive aggression. Although interaction analyses are simultaneously depicted in step 3 of each model, each interaction analysis was conducted individually at step 3.