Table 3.

Comparison of the 3D reconstruction results for the cube.

		Scale 1							Scale 2
Orientations	0	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Nev	118	54	68	100	112	132	153	178	50	93	125	152	183	205	243
Nm	11	6	10	13	15	18	21	24	6	11	14	17	21	24	28
Matching rate	9	12	14	13	14	14	14	14	11	12	11	11	11	11	12
Isolated events	14.0	5.2	5.0	4.5	4.3	3.8	3.7	3.3	5.0	5.0	4.1	4.1	3.9	3.4	3.1
Merr	20.3	17.0	15.5	15.1	15.0	15.1	15.8	14.1	17.9	14.2	11.9	11.1	13.3	12.0	10.3
Nm-correct	6	5	8	10	12	15	17	20	5	9	12	14	17	20	24
		Scale 3							Scale 4
Orientations		2	3	4	5	6	7	8	2	3	4	5	6	7	8
Nev		54	130	170	219	256	300	346	51	145	190	235	285	329	386
Nm		5	12	14	20	23	27	31	3	10	12	16	19	21	25
Matching rate		9	9	8	9	9	9	9	6	7	6	7	7	7	7
Isolated events		5.2	4.2	4.1	3.6	3.1	3.2	3.0	4.8	3.7	3.2	3.1	2.9	2.7	2.8
Merr		19.0	15.1	12.7	11.3	11.9	11.2	10.9	27.4	15.0	12.9	11.4	13.7	12.2	10.7
Nm-correct		4	10	12	17	20	23	27	2	8	10	14	16	18	22

The meaning of the columns and rows is as in Table 1.