Skip to main content
. 2013 Sep 30;5(9):90. doi: 10.1186/gm494

Table 4.

Sequencing coverage and read-mapping quality features for true-positive and false-positive predictions

Feature All TPs a All FPs b DNV c Germline d
Median read depth
 
 
 
 
 Germline
105
25h
28h
12g
 Tumor
94
20h
21g
19g
Mean non-reference allele frequency
 
 
 
 
 Germline
0.08%
1.4%g
1.27%g
1.77%g
 Tumor
43.10%
30.9%h
27.3%h
39.80%
Mean percentage uniquely mapped reads
97.10%
85.3%f
83.7%f
89.30%
Fraction of SNVs with <95% reads mapping uniquely
8.3% (19/229)
52.2%h (71/136)
57.7%h (56/97)
38.4%f (15/39)
Fraction of predicted SNVs with >5% of reads mate-rescued
4.4% (10/229)
39.7%h (54/136)
46.3%h (45/97)
23.1%e (9/39)
Mean percentage of reads mapped to multiple locations 1.90% 4.7%e 4.40% 5.5%f

Abbreviations: DNV, Did not validate; FP, false positive; J, JointSNVMix2; JS, JointSNVMix2 + SomaticSniper; M, MuTect, MJ, MuTect + JointSNVMix2; MJS, MuTect + JointSNVMix2; + SomaticSniper; MS, MuTect + SomaticSniper; NRAF, non-reference allele frequency; S, SomaticSniper; SNV, single nucleotide variant.; TP, true positive.

a'Includes all SNVs that validated in the tumor sample.

bCombined value for these two categories of FPs.

c Indicates SNVs that were not confirmed in the tumor sample.

dIndicates SNVs that were also detected in the matched germline.

Significance was tested using Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for fraction of reads mapping uniquely/by mate-pair rescue/to multiple locations: :eP<0.05; fP<1 × 10-5; gP<1 × 10-10;,,hP<1 × 10-15.